If your application for permanent residence under the start-up business class has been denied, and you suspect errors in the decision-making process, this video aims to assist you in determining your next steps. Surprisingly, IRCC officers can make mistakes, and there are measures available to revive an application after a refusal. A rejection does not necessarily mark the conclusion of your immigration journey.
Upon receiving a refusal, it’s crucial to thoroughly review the letter from IRCC and acquire your Global Case Management System (GCMS) Notes to comprehend the specific grounds for the decision. Depending on the particulars of your case and the reasons for the refusal, you have various options to explore. These options encompass reapplication, requesting reconsideration, and delving into a lesser-known yet potent strategy: initiating a Judicial Review.
Are you aspiring to attain PR status in Canada? At SINKA, we’re here to assist you! Obtain a FREE email assessment with one of our licensed immigration consultants. We converse in over +8 languages and have aided applicants from +50 countries in their journey to Canada. Simply fill out our form, click here.
What is a Judicial Review in Canadian Immigration?
Put simply, a Judicial Review serves as a reassessment of your application’s rejection. It involves a legal procedure wherein a court examines whether the decision to deny your visa was just and complied with the law. This process ensures that the denial of your application adhered to the appropriate legal criteria, safeguarding your rights by validating the fairness and legality of the decision-making process.
Who is eligible to seek a Judicial Review for Canadian Immigration?
We only recommend certain applications to pursue this route. If your initial application lacked documents, was weak, or had significant gaps, then a Judicial Review is not the ideal option for you. As immigration consultants, our aim is to craft thorough applications that address all potential issues and furnish reviewing officers with ample, well-documented evidence to support every claim made. If your application was meticulously prepared in this manner and still encountered a refusal, you might be an appropriate candidate for a Judicial Review.
Seek legal counsel and representation from an immigration lawyer to ascertain the legal grounds for the review, such as errors in law, procedural failures, or breaches of natural justice principles. They can offer advice on the viability of your case and represent you in court.
Familiarize yourself with the timelines and procedures for submitting a judicial review application. Note that there is a specified timeframe for applying for Judicial Review after receiving the refusal notification.
Additionally, it’s crucial to understand the leave requirement before applying for Judicial Review. Under Canadian immigration law, if you disagree with a decision concerning immigration, such as a visa decision, you cannot directly challenge it in court. Initially, you must seek the court’s permission to review your case, known as ‘seeking leave.’ Essentially, you’re requesting the court’s approval to present your argument at a hearing. This requirement now extends to visa decisions as well, which previously did not require this step.
Consequently, the process consists of two stages. First, you submit your request in writing. The court evaluates it and determines if your case merits further consideration. If the court denies your request, your challenge ends there, and this decision cannot be appealed.
However, if the court grants your request, you proceed to the second stage, where you present your case at a hearing. This entire process is referred to as ‘applying for leave and judicial review.’
What would be the most effective approach for initiating a Judicial Review in Canadian Immigration cases?
Understanding and clearly presenting grounds for a judicial review is essential. These grounds may include demonstrating errors in law, incorrect factual determinations, breaches of natural justice principles, exceeding of authority, or any other legal deficiencies as stipulated in the Federal Courts Act. Making compelling arguments supported by thorough documentation is crucial for convincing the court of the necessity for a review.
Moreover, similar to any legal process, adherence to procedures, timely and accurate communication, thorough preparation of case materials, comprehension of the legal rationale for review, and strict adherence to court orders and timelines are vital for achieving a successful judicial review process.
Should one consider reapplying following an unfavorable decision on a Judicial Review for Canadian Immigration?
If the leave for judicial review is granted but the judicial review itself is subsequently denied, the tribunal’s decision is upheld, indicating that the Court deems the decision-making process lawful. Consequently, the original decision made by the IRCC officer remains valid and enforceable.
In such a scenario, reapplying may not be the most practical or strategic approach.
However, it’s worth noting that if the judicial review process results in a decision being overturned and the matter is remitted for redetermination, the IRCC officer’s initial decision is effectively nullified. This nullification allows the parties involved to proceed as if the original decision had never been made, giving a different officer the opportunity to start anew. This fresh determination can consider any new facts that have emerged since the original decision. The officer or panel conducting the redetermination must adhere to principles of procedural fairness and comply with any specific directions or conclusions determined by the Court during the judicial review process.
Would you like assistance in becoming a PR in Canada? At SINKA, we’re here to assist you! Receive a FREE email assessment from one of our licensed immigration consultants. We speak over +8 languages and have supported applicants from +50 countries on their immigration journey to Canada. Simply fill out our form, click here.
What responsibilities does a Canadian Immigration Consultant fulfill?
Canadian immigration consultants are unable to offer legal counsel during judicial proceedings. However, they play a vital role in meticulously preparing initial applications to ensure compliance with all pertinent standards, thereby establishing a strong foundation should a judicial review become necessary.
In summary, effectively navigating a judicial review for a start-up visa demands a well-crafted strategy and comprehension of the legal framework. By securing expert legal representation, adhering to procedural deadlines, and developing a compelling case that addresses errors in the visa decision process, applicants can effectively contest unjust visa denials.
The Judicial Review process underscores the significance of a meticulously prepared initial application, serving as the cornerstone for any potential legal challenge. This highlights the importance of ensuring applications meet all required standards.
Approaching a judicial review with pragmatic expectations and a thorough understanding of its procedural intricacies—particularly the two-stage process of seeking leave and then, if granted, proceeding to the review itself—is imperative. Although not every application may be suitable for judicial review, for those that are, it presents a pivotal opportunity to overturn wrongful decisions. This avenue offers optimism for individuals confronted with the daunting prospect of a visa refusal.
Get a FREE email assessment
If you’re considering immigration, whether for the long term or temporarily, you’ve come to the right place! Our team is proficient in over +9 languages, and we assist applicants from more than 50 different countries throughout their immigration journey. Take advantage of our free email assessment by clicking here.
If you’re prepared to apply and would appreciate a one-on-one session with a member of our immigration team at SINKA, you can conveniently schedule a session using this consultation link.
